New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel, et al. v. FERC

New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel, et al. v. FERC

No. 20-1059, et al.

Reply in support of motion to dismiss petitions for review of extension of minimum offer price rule in PJM capacity market to certain non-exempted resources receiving out-of-market support. Calpine Corp., et al. v. PJM Interconn., L.L.C., 163 FERC ¶ 61,236 (2018) (rejecting tariff revisions and granting in part complaint), on reh'g and clarification, 171 FERC ¶ 61,034 (2020); and 169 FERC ¶ 61,239 (2019) (establishing j+r rate), on reh'g and clarification, 171 FERC ¶ 61,035 (2020).

D.C. Cir.