Commissioner Phillips Dissent on PJM Susquehanna Rehearing Order (ER24-2172-002)

Docket No. ER24-2172-002

For the reasons set forth in my dissent[1] to the original order issued November 1, 2024, I also respectfully dissent from today’s order.

Notwithstanding my disagreement with these orders’ rationale and determination,  I remain hopeful that the Commission’s recently issued order (directing PJM to show cause why its tariff remains just and reasonable and not unduly discriminatory or preferential given the absence of provisions addressing generally applicable rates, terms and conditions of service that apply to co-location arrangements, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 190 FERC ¶ 61,115 (2025)), will soon result in solutions to address what I regard as unnecessary roadblocks to the continued maturing of an industry that is vital to our  economic prosperity and national security.

For these reasons, I respectfully dissent.