Commissioner Richard Glick Statement
January 19, 2021
Docket No. EL16-49-004
Order: E-19
Although I concur in the relatively narrow determinations in today’s order, I write separately to underscore my continuing disagreement with the conclusions that the Commission has reached throughout this proceeding.[1]
For these reasons, I respectfully concur.
[1] See, e.g., Calpine Corp. v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 173 FERC ¶ 61,061 (2020) (Glick, Comm’r, dissenting); Calpine Corp. v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 171 FERC ¶ 61,035 (2020) (Glick, Comm’r, dissenting); Calpine Corp. v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 169 FERC ¶ 61,239 (2019) (Glick, Comm’r, dissenting); Calpine Corp. v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 163 FERC ¶ 61,236 (2018) (Glick, Comm’r, dissenting).