9th Cir. No. 16-70680, et al.
Orders setting hearing and orders on initial decision, on remand from California v. FERC, 784 F.3d 1267 (9th Cir. 2015), affirming findings of ALJ in the Initial Decision, that sellers’ quarterly reporting violations did not mask manipulation or market power resulting in unjust and unreasonable prices, and that California Parties have not established a basis for ordering refunds. State of California, ex rel. Bill Lockyer, Attorney General of Cal. v. British Columbia Power Exchange Corp., et al., 153 FERC ¶ 61,137 (2015) (order on remand setting hearing), order on clarification and reh’g, 157 FERC ¶ 61,154 (2016), order on reh’g, 157 FERC ¶ 61,023 (2016); 175 FERC ¶ 61,124 (2021) (order on initial decision), rehearing denied by operation of law, 176 FERC ¶ 62,046 (2021).
Orders setting hearing and orders on initial decision, on remand from California v. FERC, 784 F.3d 1267 (9th Cir. 2015), affirming findings of ALJ in the Initial Decision, that sellers’ quarterly reporting violations did not mask manipulation or market power resulting in unjust and unreasonable prices, and that California Parties have not established a basis for ordering refunds. State of California, ex rel. Bill Lockyer, Attorney General of Cal. v. British Columbia Power Exchange Corp., et al., 153 FERC ¶ 61,137 (2015) (order on remand setting hearing), order on clarification and reh’g, 157 FERC ¶ 61,154 (2016), order on reh’g, 157 FERC ¶ 61,023 (2016); 175 FERC ¶ 61,124 (2021) (order on initial decision), rehearing denied by operation of law, 176 FERC ¶ 62,046 (2021).
This page was last updated on March 01, 2022