Commissioner Christie’s Concurrence to AES Ohio (Dayton) — Amazon Agreement, ER25-192

Docket No. ER25-192-000

I concur solely because, as today’s order points out in footnote 50,[1] the clear intent of the parties is for Amazon Data Services, Inc., not other consumers, to pay for the costs of the Transmission Customer New or Upgraded Service Construction Service Agreement (CSA).  On that core principle I agree with the Ohio Consumer Counsel.  Moreover, that principle should apply regardless of the rate treatment used to implement this CSA.[2]

For these reasons, I respectfully concur.