Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. v. FERC Nos. 04-1234, et al. Whether, consistent with 1992 settlement, Transco must continue to acquire capacity at certain receipt points and assign such capacity to Sunoco at settlement rates, terms and conditions; Direction to Transco to reimburse Sunoco for the additional costs Sunoco incurred as a result of Transco's violation of settlement. Sunoco, Inc. (R&M) v. Trancontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp., 100 FERC & 61,252 (2002), order on reh'g, 103 FERC & 61,176 (2003), order on reh'g, 107 FERC & 61,123 (2004), order on voluntary remand, 111 FERC ¶ 61,400 (2005), order on reh'g, 114 FERC ¶ 61,180 (2006). Circuit D.C. Cir.

This page was last updated on August 06, 2020