Docket No. ER24-232-001
I continue to dissent as I did in the underlying order.[1] As I said in my original dissent, “I agree with the. . . New York State Public Service Commission (NYSPSC) [and other protestors] that the incentives granted in this order go beyond the Commission’s practices and what should be accepted by this Commission. . . . It also appears that . . . the extent of the incentives will be egregiously unfair to New York consumers.”[2]
There is therefore no need for a briefing on the RTO Adder. As I said in my earlier dissent “I find the arguments of and questions raised by the NYSPSC [and other protestors] compelling.”[3]
For these reasons, I respectfully dissent.
[1] New York Transco, LLC, 185 FERC ¶ 61,222 (2023) (Christie, Comm’r, dissenting) (Christie Transco Incentives Dissent) (available at https://www.ferc.gov/news-events/news/commissioner-christies-dissent-ny-transcos-application-including-incentives-and).
[2] Christie Transco Incentive Dissent at P 1 (footnotes omitted).
[3] Id. P 3.