Commissioner James Danly Statement
March 1, 2021
Docket No. ER20-2919-000

The Commission’s order in this proceeding grants two waivers of the deadlines associated with the Review Period, Informal Challenges, and Final Posting associated with the Annual Update to Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc.’s (Tri-State) formula rate.  One of the requested waivers was a prospective waiver of a deadline that had not yet occurred at the time of Tri-State’s filing.  I concur with the Commission’s decision to grant that waiver for the reasons stated in the order.

The second request was for a retroactive waiver of a deadline that had passed prior to Tri-State’s filing.  I dissent from the Commission’s decision to grant that waiver because it violates the filed rate doctrine, for reasons I have previously explained.[1]  Instead, the Commission should have denied the waiver and then relied upon its authority under Federal Power Act section 309 to find that no action should be taken against Tri-State for its failure to apply its tariff deadline prior to the date of its filing.[2]

For these reasons, I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part.

 

[1] See Sunflower Elec. Power Corp., 173 FERC ¶ 61,054 (2020) (Danly, Comm’r, dissenting at P 5.

[2] See Verso Corp. v. FERC, 898 F.3d 1, 10 (D.C. Cir. 2018); Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. FERC, 750 F.2d 105, 109 (D.C. Cir.1984).

Contact Information


This page was last updated on July 21, 2021