Kansas Corp. Comm’n v. FERC
Kansas Corp. Comm’n v. FERC Nos. 16-1027 Level of the base return on equity; application of that return to other, yet-to-be-formed affiliates; transmission formula rate template and protocols for projects developed in Southwest Power Pool transmission planning process. .
City of Clarksville, Tenn. v. FERC
City of Clarksville, Tenn. v. FERC No. 16-1244 Service area determinations for natural gas distribution facilities that extend across the Tennessee/ Kentucky border into Kentucky. City of Clarksville, Tenn., 146 FERC ¶ 61,074 (2014), reh’g denied, 155 FERC ¶ 61,184 (2016). Circuit D.C. Cir.
City of Boston, et al. v. FERC
City of Boston, et al. v. FERC No. 16-1081, et al. Order authorizing construction and operation of Algonquin Incremental Market (AIM) pipeline project, consisting of 37.4 miles of pipeline and appurtenant facilities in NY, CT, RI, and MA.
Old Dominion Electric Cooperative v. FERC
Old Dominion Electric Cooperative v. FERC No. 16-1111 Denial of petition for waiver, seeking recovery of natural gas costs associated with Jan. 2014 cold weather. Old Dominion Elec. Coop., 151 FERC ¶ 61,207 (2015), reh’g denied, 154 FERC ¶ 61,155 (2016). Circuit D.C. Cir.
New England Power Generators Ass’n v. FERC
New England Power Generators Ass’n v. FERC No.
BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., et al. v. FERC
BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., et al. v. FERC Nos. 16-1013, et al. Order on ALJ Initial Decision, addressing various issues concerning 2009 and 2010 rate filings for service on the Trans Alaska Pipeline System. BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., et al., 153 FERC ¶ 61,233 (2015). Circuit D.C. Cir.
Sierra Club, et al. v. FERC
Sierra Club, et al. v. FERC No. 16-1329 Commission's opposition to a motion for emergency stay of natural gas pipeline construction and motion for expedited review. Circuit D.C. Cir.
Pub. Utils. Comm’n of Cal., et al. v. FERC
Pub. Utils. Comm’n of Cal., et al. v. FERC Nos. 01-71934, et al. California energy crisis orders, calculating mitigated market clearing price and adjusting for fuel allowances and cost offsets. San Diego Gas & Electric Co., et al., 97 FERC ¶ 61,275 (Dec. 19, 20001), and later orders.
NE Power Generators Ass’n, et al. v. FERC
NE Power Generators Ass’n, et al. v. FERC Nos. 15-1071 and 16-1042 Orders on complaints, alleging that certain provisions in ISO-NE tariff, governing operation of Forward Capacity Market, are unjust, unreasonable, and unduly discriminatory. New England Power Generators Ass’n v.
State Corp. Comm’n of Kansas v. FERC
State Corp. Comm’n of Kansas v. FERC No. 15-1447 Integration of additional transmission-owning utilities – Western-UGP, Basin Electric, and Heartland Power Dist. – into Southwest Power Pool.