Appellate Briefs
Public Service Electric and Gas Co., et al. v. FERC
D.C. Cir. Nos. 19-1091 and 20-1039
Appellate Briefs
California Public Utilities Commission, et al. v. FERC
9th Cir. Nos. 19-72897 and 20-71335
Appellate Briefs
SFPP, L.P., et al. v. FERC and USofA
D.C. Cir. Nos. 19-1067, et al.
Response to shipper petition for court (panel) rehearing of 7/31/20 decision affirming FERC on all issues, concerning:
Appellate Briefs
Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm’n v. FERC
No. 20-1024
Implementation of Entergy bandwidth formula and calculations for 7-month period in 2005; applicability of 2009 tariff amendment. Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm’n, v. Entergy Services, Inc., 167 FERC ¶ 61,186 (2019), reh’g denied, 169 FERC ¶ 61,247 (2019).
D.C. Cir.
Appellate Briefs
Aircraft Service Intn’l v. FERC and USofA
D.C. Cir. No. 20-1013
Order affirming administrative law judge’s initial decision, rejecting complaint that pipeline and storage facility companies are providing interstate services, including services at Orlando International Airport, without a tariff or rates on file. Aircraft Service International Group, Inc., et al. v. Central Florida Pipeline, LLC, et al., Op. 567, 169 FERC ¶ 61,134 (2019).
Appellate Briefs
Deborah Evans, et al. v. FERC
D.C. Cir. No. 20-1161, et al.
Respondent’s Opposition To Motion For Summary
Vacatur Or For A Stay Of The Certificate
Appellate Briefs
Entergy Services, Inc., et al. v. FERC
No. 17-1251, et al.
Calculation of refunds as a result of Entergy’s violation of the System Agreement through improper allocation of energy used to source Entergy Arkansas’s off-system sales of energy. Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm’n v. Entergy Corp., Op. No. 521, 139 FERC ¶ 61,240 (2012), order on reh’g, 155 FERC ¶ 61,064 (2016), order on reh’g, 160 FERC ¶ 61,109 (2016); Op. No. 548, 155 FERC ¶ 61,065 (2017), reh’g denied, 161 FERC ¶ 61,171 (2017); Op. No. 565, 165 FERC ¶ 61,022 (2018), reh’g denied, 169 FERC ¶ 61,179 (2019).
Appellate Briefs
Allegheny Defense Project, et al. v. FERC
D.C. Cir. No. 17-1098, et al.
Motion of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to stay issuance of the mandate.
Appellate Briefs
Shafer & Freeman Lakes Conserv. Corp. v. FERC
Shafer & Freeman Lakes Conserv. Corp. v. FERC
D.C. Cir. No. 19-1066
Amended license for Norway-Oakdale Hydroelectric Project on Tippecanoe River in Indiana; modified definition of “abnormal river conditions” and modified flows to protect endangered species. N. Indiana Pub. Serv. Co. LLC, 163 FERC ¶ 61,212 (2018), reh’g denied, 166 FERC ¶ 61,030 (2019).
Appellate Briefs
New York DEC and Sierra Club v. FERC
New York DEC and Sierra Club v. FERC
Nos. 19-1610, et al.
Finding that New York waived its authority under the Clean Water Act to issue or deny water quality certification for the Northern Access pipeline project, by failing to act within one year of receiving the application for water quality certification. National Fuel Gas Supply Corpa., 164 FERC ¶ 61,084 (2018), reh’g denied, 167 FERC ¶ 61,007 (2019).
2nd Cir.
Appellate Briefs
Louisville Gas and Elec. Co., et al. v. FERC
No. 19-4225
Order granting in part complaint that LG&E/KU violated rate schedule by failing to reimburse Owensboro for pancaked transmission charges incurred to import energy from a source in MISO to serve Owensboro load connected to LG&E/KU transmission system. Owensboro Municipal Utils. v. Louisville Gas and Elec. Co. and Kentucky Utils. Co., 166 FERC ¶ 61,131 (2019), reh'g denied, 169 FERC ¶ 61,030 (2019).
6th Cir.
Appellate Briefs
International Transm. Co., et al. v. FERC
International Transm. Co., et al. v. FERC
No. 19-1190
Order granting complaint in part, reducing (but not eliminating) return on equity rate adder for independent, stand-alone transmission companies. Consumers Energy Co., et al. v. Intern’tl Transm. Co., et al., 165 FERC ¶ 61,021 (2018), reh’g denied, 168 FERC ¶ 61,035 (2019).
D.C. Cir.
Appellate Briefs
Notice of Multicircuit Petitions for Review
Notice of Multicircuit Petitions for Review
Referral of multicircuit petitions for review of Commission orders rejecting PJM tariff revisions, Calpine Corp. v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 163 FERC ¶ 61,236 (2018), on reh'g and clarification, 171 FERC ¶ 61,034 (2020), and setting just and reasonable rate, Calpine Corp. v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 169 FERC ¶ 61,239 (2019), on reh'g and clarification, 171 FERC ¶ 61,035 (2020), to the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation for random venue selection.
MCP No. 160
Appellate Briefs
New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel, et al. v. FERC
New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel, et al. v. FERC
No. 20-1059, et al.
Reply in support of motion to dismiss petitions for review of extension of minimum offer price rule in PJM capacity market to certain non-exempted resources receiving out-of-market support. Calpine Corp., et al. v. PJM Interconn., L.L.C., 163 FERC ¶ 61,236 (2018) (rejecting tariff revisions and granting in part complaint), on reh'g and clarification, 171 FERC ¶ 61,034 (2020); and 169 FERC ¶ 61,239 (2019) (establishing j+r rate), on reh'g and clarification, 171 FERC ¶ 61,035 (2020).
D.C. Cir.
Appellate Briefs
City and County of San Francisco v. FERC
City and County of San Francisco v. FERC
No. 20-1084
Motion to dismiss order, following evidentiary hearing and ALJ initial decision, concerning whether PG&E will unreasonably deny service to San Francisco upon expiration of the 1987 Interconnection Agreement between the parties. City and County of San Francisco v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co., Opinion No. 568, 169 FERC ¶ 61,128 (2019), reh’g pending (tolling order issued Jan. 21, 2020)
D.C. Cir.
Appellate Briefs
Baltimore Gas & Elec. Co. v. FERC
Baltimore Gas & Elec. Co. v. FERC
No. 18-1298
Response in opposition to BG&E petition for rehearing of Mar. 27, 2020 court decision, affirming FERC order rejecting proposed revisions to BG&E formula transmission rate, seeking to recover previously-incurred tax amounts. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 161 FERC ¶ 61,163 (2017), order on reh’g & clar., 164 FERC ¶ 61,173 (2018).
D.C. Cir.
Appellate Briefs
Bohon, et al. v. FERC
Bohon, et al. v. FERC
No. 20-CV-6 (J. Boasberg)
Reply in support of motion to dismiss, for lack of jurisdiction, challenge in federal district court by landowners to exercise of eminent domain authority by Mountain Valley Pipeline, alleging improper delegation of eminent domain authority from Congress to FERC under Natural Gas Act and improper sub-delegation from FERC to private entities.
D.D.C.
Appellate Briefs
New Jersey Div. of Rate Counsel, et al. v. FERC
New Jersey Div. of Rate Counsel, et al. v. FERC
Nos. 20-1059 and 20-1095
Motion to dismiss petitions for review of extension of minimum offer price rule in PJM capacity market to certain non-exempted resources receiving out-of-market support. Calpine Corp., et al. v. PJM Interconn., L.L.C., 163 FERC ¶ 61,236 (2018) (rejecting tariff revisions and granting in part complaint), and 169 FERC ¶ 61,239 (2019) (establishing j+r rate), reh’g pending.
D.C. Cir.