Hoopa Valley Tribe v. FERC
Hoopa Valley Tribe v. FERC No. 09-1134 Denial of motion filed by Hoopa Valley Tribe to impose interim license conditions, during relicensing proceeding, to impose ramping rate and minimum flow conditions to protect trout.
Southern California Edison Co. v. FERC
Southern California Edison Co. v. FERC Nos. 05-1327, et al.
Attorney General of Virginia, et al. v. FERC
Attorney General of Virginia, et al. v. FERC Nos. 09-2052, et al. Approval of special surcharge to recover Dominion Virginia Power's share of RTO start-up and administrative costs. Virginia Electric and Power Co., 125 FERC ¶ 61,391 (2008), order on reh'g, 128 FERC ¶ 61,026 (2009).
Washington Gas Light Co. v. FERC
Washington Gas Light Co. v. FERC No. 09-1100 Order on remand from Washington Gas Light Co. v. FERC, 532 F.3d 928 (D.C. Cir.
Interstate Nat. Gas Ass'n of America v. FERC
Interstate Nat. Gas Ass'n of America v. FERC No. 09-1016 Revisions to the Commission's Part 284 regulations concerning the release of firm capacity by shippers on interstate natural gas pipelines in order to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the secondary capacity release market.
Missouri Public Service Comm'n v. FERC
Missouri Public Service Comm'n v. FERC No. 09-1121 Abandonment and certificate authorizations to certain natural gas pipelines reorganizing into a single FERC-regulated interstate natural gas company; ratemaking issues.
Resolute Natural Resources Co. v. FERC
Resolute Natural Resources Co. v. FERC No. 08-1268 Acceptance of Western's tariffs establishing rates and rules governing south to north interstate movement of crude petroleum from points in New Mexico and Texas to certain points in New Mexico, effective 3/10/08.
Sacramento Municipal Util. District v. FERC
Sacramento Municipal Util. District v. FERC Nos. 07-1208,et al.
James Lichoulas, Jr. v. FERC
James Lichoulas, Jr. v. FERC No. 08-1373 Termination by implied surrender of license for the Appleton Trust Project in Lowell, Massachusetts; allegation of improper ex parte congressional interference. James Lichoulas, Jr., 124 FERC ¶ 61,255 (2008), reh'g denied, 125 FERC ¶ 61,195 (2008).
PNGTS Shippers Group v. FERC
PNGTS Shippers Group v. FERC No. 09-1029 Declaratory order that certificated capacity of PNGTS system is 168,000 Mcf per day, once expansion facilities placed in service; rate issues reserved for next PNGTS rate proceeding.