Search Results

ExxonMobil Gas & Power Mrktg. Co. v. FERC No. 10-1098 Acceptance and suspension of, and hearing on, limited rate filing to establish a mechanism to record and recover hurricane-related costs not recovered from insurance proceeds or third parties (Hurricane Surcharge).

PSEG Energy Resources & Trade v. FERC No. 10-1103 Results of ISO New England’s first Forward Capacity Auction, for the 2010-2011 period; price proration for Connecticut generators not allowed to reduce capacity due to ISO reliability review.

Indiana Utility Regulatory Comm'n v. FERC No. 10-1313 Participation of retail customers in PJM’s demand response program; whether local utility or retail aggregator certifies eligibility for program.

Texas Pipeline Ass’n, et al. v. FERC Nos. 10-60066 et al.

George Jepson, AG of Conn. v. FERC No. 10-1104 ISO-New England’s collection of administrative costs for calendar year 2010, including executive compensation and salary structure. ISO New England, Inc., 129 FERC ¶ 61,299 (2009), reh’g denied, 130 FERC ¶ 61,236 (2010). Circuit D.C. Cir.

Summit Lake Paiute Tribe, et al. and Defenders of Wildlife, et al. v. FERC Nos. 10-1389 and 10-1047 Emergency motion for stay denied. Circuit D.C. Cir.

County of Butte, Cal. v. FERC No. 10-70140 Denial of complaint that California DWR, licensee for the Oroville Project in Butte County, California, was in violation of recreation and public safety requirements of its hydroelectric license. County of Butte, Cal. v. Cal. Dept.

Texas Pipeline Ass'n, et al. v. FERC Nos. 10-60066, et al.

Summit Lake Paiute Tribe, et al. v. FERC Nos. 10-1389 and 10-1407 Opposition to motion for stay of pipeline construction pending judicial review. Circuit D.C. Cir.

Richard Blumenthal, Attorney General for the State of CT, et al. and Public Citizen, Inc., et al. Nos.