Search Results

Tesoro Alaska Co., et al. v. FERC No. 13-1248, et al. Approval of contested settlement, addressing cost pooling among owners of the Trans Alaska Pipeline System. BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., et al., 144 FERC ¶ 61,025 (2013). Circuit D.C. Cir.

Missouri Pub. Serv. Comm’n v. FERC No. 13-1278 Order on remand from Missouri Pub. Serv. Comm’n v. FERC, 601 F.3d 581 (D.C. Cir.

Central Hudson Gas & Elec., et al. v. FERC Approval of new capacity zone in New York; redefinition of demand curves in New York installed capacity market. New York Indep.

Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm’n v. FERC No. 13-60784 Implementation of bandwidth remedy based on calendar year 2008 data – third annual bandwidth proceeding; consideration of various inputs to formula. Entergy Services, Inc., Op. No.

Turlock Irrigation Dist., et al. v. FERC Nos. 13-1250, et al. Determination that licensing is required for unlicensed 4.9 MW La Grange Project, on the Tuolumne River in California, because of findings based on navigability, federal lands, and post-1935 construction. Turlock Irrigation Dist.

Electric Power Supply Ass’n, et al. v. FERC Nos. 11-1486, et al. Petition for rehearing en banc.

St. Paul Park Refining Co. v. FERC and USofA No. 13-1302 Order dismissing complaint that alleged that 2008 settlement, instituting a surcharge for an oil pipeline expansion project, no longer is just and reasonable. St. Paul Park Refining Co. LLC v.

In Re: People of the State of New York and Public Service Comm’n of the State of New York No. 14-1502 Opposition to petition for mandamus and stay of FERC order accepting creation of a new capacity zone for the Lower Hudson Valley. Circuit 2nd Cir.

Dept. of Interior v. FERC No. 13-2439 Replacement of the existing wooden flashboards of Pawtucket Dam in Lowell, Mass. with an inflatable crest gate system, to reduce risk of flooding; effect on historic preservation. Boott Hydropower and Eldred L.

Midland Power Coop. and NRECA v. FERC No.