BNP Paribas Energy Trading v. FERC
BNP Paribas Energy Trading v. FERC No. 12-1242 Allocation of Transco’s cost of purchasing base gas in storage, needed to pressurize the reservoir to support top gas entitlements, between historic and new shippers. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp., Opinion No.
New England Power Generators, et al. v. FERC
New England Power Generators, et al. v. FERC No. 12-1060, et al. Various tariff revisions to redesign New England Forward Capacity Market. ISO New England, Inc., et al., 131 FERC ¶ 61,065 (2010), orders on reh’g, 132 FERC ¶ 61,122 (2010), 135 FERC ¶ 61,029 (2011), and 138 FERC ¶ 61,027 (2012).
Southwest Power Pool v. FERC
Southwest Power Pool v. FERC No.
George Feighner v. FERC
George Feighner v. FERC No. 13-1016 Emergency motion for stay of pipeline construction denied. Circuit D.C. Cir.
Delaware Riverkeeper Network, et al. v. FERC
Delaware Riverkeeper Network, et al. v. FERC No. 13-1015 Commission’s opposition to emergency motion to stay concerning tree clearing and construction of a 40-mile pipeline. Circuit D.C. Cir.
In re Minisink Residents for Environmental Preservation and Safety, et al. v. FERC
In re Minisink Residents for Environmental Preservation and Safety, et al. v. FERC No. 12-1481 Commission’s opposition to motion for stay to halt operation of natural gas compressor station where stated harm was the perceived safety threat to nearby residents. Circuit D.C. Cir.
Illinois Commerce Comm’n, et al. v. FERC
Illinois Commerce Comm’n, et al. v. FERC No. 11-3421, et al.
Northern Laramie Range Alliance v. FERC
Northern Laramie Range Alliance v. FERC No. 12-9567 Denial of request that FERC revoke qualifying facility status of two wind facilities; whether facilities are close enough together to warrant consideration collectively for purpose of 80 MW size limit.
Black Oak Energy LLC, et al. v. FERC
Black Oak Energy LLC, et al. v. FERC No. 08-1386, et al. Complaint concerning PJM implementation of marginal line loss methodology with respect to virtual traders; payment and timing of refunds. Black Oak Energy, L.L.C., et al. v.
North Carolina Utils. Comm’n v. FERC
North Carolina Utils. Comm’n v. FERC No. 12-1881 Transmission rate incentives, awarding a return on equity adder to base ROE for various transmission enhancement projects. Virginia Electric and Power Co., 124 FERC ¶ 61,207 (2008), reh’g denied, 139 FERC ¶ 61,143 (2012). Circuit 4th Cir.