Florida Municipal Power Agency v. FERC
Florida Municipal Power Agency v. FERC No. 06-1285 Order on remand from FMPA v. FERC, 411 F.3d 287 (D.C. Cir. 2005), concerning whether physical incapacity provides a basis for an exception to full load ratio pricing for network service.
Old Dominion Electric Coop., et al. v. FERC
Old Dominion Electric Coop., et al. v. FERC Nos. 06-1326, et al. Rejection of proposed rate schedules that would have allowed generators to recover, from transmission service customers, costs of interconnections with the PJM transmission grid.
Petro Star, et al. v. FERC and USofA
Petro Star, et al. v. FERC and USofA Nos. 06-1166, et al.
Klamath Water Users Ass'n v. FERC
Klamath Water Users Ass'n v. FERC No. 06-1212 Denial of petition for declaratory order, seeking ruling that 1956 contract is a condition of the license for the Klamath Project and will remain in effect during the term of any annual license issued during relicensing proceeding.
Louisiana PSC, et al. v. FERC
Louisiana PSC, et al. v. FERC Nos. 05-1462, et al.
Cargill Power Markets, et al. v. FERC
Cargill Power Markets, et al. v. FERC No. 06-1084 Denial of complaint challenging Midwest ISO's discontinuing transmission rate discount for firm service "sinking" at the Michigan-Ontario interface.
Cogeneration Ass'n of California v. FERC
Cogeneration Ass'n of California v. FERC No. 06-1178 Setting of standby customer transmission rates, based on adjusted contract demand using a probabilistic methodology rather than using the 12 coincident peak methodology. Pacific Gas and Electric Co., Op. No.
Gas Transmission, Northwest Corp. v.
Gas Transmission, Northwest Corp. v. FERC Nos. 03-1257, et al. Creditworthiness and collateral requirements for pipeline shippers. North Baja Pipeline, LLC et al., 115 FERC ¶ 61,141 (2006) and 117 FERC ¶ 61,146 (2006); e prime, Inc. v.
Southern California Edison Co. v. FERC
Southern California Edison Co. v. FERC No. 06-1202 Denial of rate filing intended to recover additional interconnection costs after contractual deadline for such filing. Southern California Edison Co., 113 FERC ¶ 61,018 (2005), reh'g denied, 115 FERC ¶ 61,100 (2006). Circuit D.C. Cir.
Fall River
Fall River Rural Electric Coop. v. FERC No. 06-71944 Dismissal of application of Fall River for a proposed hydroelectric project located at an existing dam included in license earlier issued to PPL Montana, on the ground that it would substantially interfere with PPL's license.