Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. FERC
Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. FERC Nos. 06-1025, et al. On remand from Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. FERC, 347 F.3d 964 (D.C.
Xcel Energy Services Inc. v. FERC
Xcel Energy Services Inc. v. FERC No. 06-1174 Denial of waiver of prior notice and filing requirement, for late filing of generator interconnection agreements long after their effectiveness. Xcel Energy Services, Inc., 114 FERC ¶ 61,295 (2006), denying reh'g of 12/23/05 unpublished letter order.
Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Co. v. FERC
Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Co. v. FERC No. 06-1145 Order, affirming ALJ, that Williston must convert nature of transportation service to Northern States Power and that Williston must increase NSP's Annual Delivery Quantity under transportation contract.
Illinois Municipal Gas Agency, et al. v. FERC
Illinois Municipal Gas Agency, et al. v. FERC Nos. 06-1006, et al. Reaffirmance of policy permitting selective rate discounting, on a non-discriminatory basis, in order to meet competition.
Keyspan LNG, L.P. v. FERC
Keyspan LNG, L.P. v. FERC No. 06-1097 Denial, based on safety concerns, of proposal by KeySpan to site, construct and operate a LNG import terminal in Providence, Rhode Island. KeySpan LNG, L.P., et al., 112 FERC ¶ 61,028 (2005), reh'g denied, 114 FERC ¶ 61,054 (2006). Circuit D.C. Cir.
Burlington Resources Oil & Gas v. FERC
Burlington Resources Oil & Gas v. FERC No. 06-1042 Order on remand from Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co. v. FERC, 396 F.3d 405 (D.C. Cir. 2005), again finding that Burlington must refund Kansas ad valorem taxes to pipelines on first sales of natural gas. Burlington Res.
East Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. FERC
East Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. FERC No. 06-1090 Order, affirming ALJ after hearing, that East Texas is not entitled to credits under CSW open access transmission tariff for transmission facilities that East Texas claims are integrated with the CSW transmission system.
Transm. Agency of Northern Cal. v. FERC
Transm. Agency of Northern Cal. v. FERC Nos. 05-1402, et al. Orders on remand from PG&E v. FERC, 306 F.3d 1112 (D.C. Cir.
Midwest Region Gas Task Force Ass'n v. FERC
Midwest Region Gas Task Force Ass'n v. FERC Nos. 05-1468, et al. Acceptance of discounted rate agreements, subject to certain conditions.
State Water Contractors, et al. v. FERC
State Water Contractors, et al. v. FERC No. 06-74506 Commission affirmed that the California ISO's Transmission Access Charge, designed to recover embedded cost of the ISO-controlled grid, was just and reasonable despite rate methodology not being time-sensitive.