Search Results

KeySpan-Ravenswood, LLC v. FERC No. 05-1332 Denial of complaint alleging that NYISO charged its members rates that were not consistent with filed rate schedules; translation of installed capacity (ICAP) requirements into unforced capacity (UCAP). KeySpan Ravenswood, LLC v.

Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline v. FERC No. 05-1209 Directive to Williston to recalculate its cost of service underlying its rates and to make refunds.

New Mexico Attorney General v. FERC Nos. 04-1398, et al. Conditional approval of Southwest Power Pool as a RTO, subject to fulfillment of various requirements. Southwest Power Pool, Inc., 106 FERC ¶ 61,110 (2004), order on reh'g, 109 FERC ¶ 61,010 (2004). Circuit D.C. Cir.

Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. FERC No. 05-1285 Directive that Columbia remove, from discount rate agreements, restrictions on shippers' rights to challenge the base rates and rate structures, or refile agreements as negotiated rate agreements.

Louisiana Public Service Comm'n v. FERC No. 05-1161 Directive to Entergy to modify Entergy System Agreement prospectively to exclude interruptible load from the calculation of peak load responsibility in computing charges for the Entergy system. Louisiana Pub. Serv.

Sacramento Municipal Utility Dist. v. FERC No. 05-1231 Termination of extra high voltage (EHV) transmission service provided to SMUD. Pacific Gas and Electric Co., 109 FERC ¶ 61,255 (2004), reh'g denied, 111 FERC ¶ 61,175 (2005). Circuit D.C. Cir.

Virginia State Corp. Comm'n v. FERC Nos. 05-1147, et al. Conditional approval of joint proposal to establish PJM as the RTO for Virginia Electric and Power Co.; accounting of RTO costs as regulatory assets. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. and Virginia Elec.

Chevron Natural Gas, et al. v. FERC No. 04-1347 Acceptance, as modified in several respects, of Tennessee's Order No. 637 compliance filing.

Westar Energy, Inc. v. FERC No. 05-1193 Rejection of FY 2002 corrections to annual charges calculation. Revision of Annual Charges to Public Utilities (Westar Energy, Inc. and Kansas Gas and Elec. Co.), 111 FERC ¶ 61,086 (2005) (denying rehearing of letter order). Circuit D.C. Cir.

Williams Gas Processing v. FERC No. 05-1342 Jurisdictional finding that natural gas pipeline facilities located downstream of jurisdictional facilities owned by Jupiter Energy are themselves jurisdictional transmission facilities.