Search Results

James M. Knott, et al. v. FERC Nos. 00-1909, et al. Requirement to install streamflow gages and submit microfilm cards of flood flow modulator drawings; finding that Riverdale Mills Project, on the Blackstone River in Massachusetts, is subject to FERC's mandatory licensing jurisdiction. James M.

Edison Mission Energy, Inc., et al. v. FERC No. 03-1228 Approval of comprehensive market power mitigation plan for New York, including Automated Mitigation Procedure. New York Independent System Operator, Inc., et al., 99 FERC ¶ 61,246 (2002), order on reh'g, 103 FERC ¶ 61,291 (2003).

Nos. 03-74207, et al.

Entergy Services, Inc. v. FERC No. 03-1271 Requirement that Entergy refund to QF host loads all charges collected under its "schedules first" policy. Entergy Services, Inc., et al., 103 FERC ¶ 61,125 (2003), reh'q denied, 104 FERC ¶ 61,061 (2003). Circuit D.C. Cir.

Golden Northwest Aluminum, Inc., et al. v. BPA and FERC Nos. 03-73426, et al. Confirmation and approval of Bonneville Power Administration's proposed 5-year power rates, commencing Oct.

Midwest ISO, et al. v. FERC Nos. 03-1238, et al. Denial of petition for rulemaking seeking revision to the way the Commission collects electric annual charges (based on volume of electricity transmission rather than sales).

Borough of Olyphant, Pennsylvania v. FERC No. 03-1284 Interpretation of settlement agreement between PPL and wholesale requirements customers, concerning recovery of retail stranded costs. PPL Electric Utilities Corp., 101 FERC 61,370 (2002), order on reh'g, 104 FERC 61,259 (2003). Circuit D.C.

Electric Power Supply Ass'n v. FERC No. 03-1182 Revision to ex parte rules, treating communications between Commission-approved market monitors and Commission staff as exempt, not subject to disclosure or notice.

Chevron-Texaco, et al. v. FERC No. 03-1153 Calculation of annual cashout surcharge for year commencing 11/1/02; proceeding under NGA ' 5 to revise cashout mechanism. ANR Pipeline Co., 101 FERC ¶ 61,123 (2002), order on reh'q, 103 FERC ¶ 61,065 (2003). Circuit D.C. Cir.

In re: Mirant Corp., et al. v. FERC Nos. 04-10001, et al. Appeal of district court's denial of motion to allow Mirant to reject contracts with PEPCO and to restrain FERC from taking action regarding any Mirant contract. [no orders] Circuit 5th Cir.