Umpqua Valley Audubon Society v. FERC
Umpqua Valley Audubon Society v. FERC No. 04-72600 New license for North Umpqua Project in Douglas County, Oregon; challenge to § 4(e) conditions issued by the Forest Service and adopted as mandatory license conditions.
Columbia Gas Transm. Corp. v. FERC
Columbia Gas Transm. Corp. v. FERC Interpretation of Columbia's tariff to require Columbia to install and pay for meters and meter stations to measure gas received into its system. Nicole Gas Production Ltd., 103 FERC ¶ 61,328 (2003), order on reh'g, 105 FERC 61,371 (2003). No.
Mike Brady and Cheryl Creekmore v. FERC
Mike Brady and Cheryl Creekmore v. FERC No. 04-1058 Authorization to expand and reconfigure marina on project reservoir to increase amount of boating. Grand River Dam Authority, 105 FERC ¶ 61,100 (2003), reh'g denied, 105 FERC ¶ 61,310 (2003). Circuit D.C. Cir.
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. FERC
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. FERC No. 03-1452 Acceptance, as modified, of Tennessee's tariff sheets revising creditworthiness requirements for shippers. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., 102 FERC ¶ 61,075 (2003), order on reh'g, 103 FERC ¶ 61,275 (2003), order on reh'g, 105 FERC ¶ 61,120 (2003).
PSC of Kentucky, et al. v. FERC
PSC of Kentucky, et al. v. FERC Nos. 03-1092, et al. Calculation of rate of return on equity component (12.88%) of transmission service rates for Midwest ISO transmission owners, based on the midpoint of the zone rather than the median as petitioners had requested.
DTE Energy Co., et al. v. FERC
DTE Energy Co., et al. v. FERC No. 04-1020 Finding that certain facilities perform a transmission (as opposed to a local distribution) function and that functional control must be turned over to the Midwest ISO.
Pacific Gas and Electric Co., et al. v. FERC
Pacific Gas and Electric Co., et al. v. FERC Nos. 03-72874, et al. Approval of settlement agreements between FERC Staff, Reliant and Duke; denial of late intervention and party status to California Parties and other movants.
Pacific Gas and Electric Co., et al. v. FERC
Pacific Gas and Electric Co., et al. v. FERC Nos. 04-70635, et al. Approval and denial of procedures under ISO Amendment No. 51 to complete re-runs of its settlement system so that it will be able to do the re-run ordered in the California refund proceeding.
Alternate Power Source, Inc. v. FERC
Alternate Power Source, Inc. v. FERC No. 03-1398 Denial of complaint that pass-through of certain charges under wholesale power supply contract violated tariff and open access rules, and was unduly discriminatory. Alternate Power Source, Inc. v. Western Mass.
Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co. v. FERC
Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co. v. FERC Nos. 03-1340, et al. Directive that Burlington refund Kansas ad valorem taxes to Northern Natural and Panhandle on sales of natural gas; effect of earlier settlements.