PSC of Kentucky, et al. v. FERC
PSC of Kentucky, et al. v. FERC Nos. 03-1092, et al. Calculation of rate of return on equity component (12.88%) of transmission service rates for Midwest ISO transmission owners, based on the midpoint of the zone rather than the median as petitioners had requested.
DTE Energy Co., et al. v. FERC
DTE Energy Co., et al. v. FERC No. 04-1020 Finding that certain facilities perform a transmission (as opposed to a local distribution) function and that functional control must be turned over to the Midwest ISO.
Pacific Gas and Electric Co., et al. v. FERC
Pacific Gas and Electric Co., et al. v. FERC Nos. 03-72874, et al. Approval of settlement agreements between FERC Staff, Reliant and Duke; denial of late intervention and party status to California Parties and other movants.
Pacific Gas and Electric Co., et al. v. FERC
Pacific Gas and Electric Co., et al. v. FERC Nos. 04-70635, et al. Approval and denial of procedures under ISO Amendment No. 51 to complete re-runs of its settlement system so that it will be able to do the re-run ordered in the California refund proceeding.
Alternate Power Source, Inc. v. FERC
Alternate Power Source, Inc. v. FERC No. 03-1398 Denial of complaint that pass-through of certain charges under wholesale power supply contract violated tariff and open access rules, and was unduly discriminatory. Alternate Power Source, Inc. v. Western Mass.
Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co. v. FERC
Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co. v. FERC Nos. 03-1340, et al. Directive that Burlington refund Kansas ad valorem taxes to Northern Natural and Panhandle on sales of natural gas; effect of earlier settlements.
Jupiter Energy Corp. v. FERC
Jupiter Energy Corp. v. FERC No. 04-60041 Finding that offshore natural gas pipeline facilities remain jurisdictional transmission facilities, and denying requests for abandonment authorization and rescission of certificates.
PUD No. 1 of Snohomish County v. FERC
PUD No. 1 of Snohomish County v. FERC Nos. 03-72511, et al. Denial of complaints seeking modification of bilateral contracts in Western wholesale power forward markets; rehearing of applicable standard of review (public interest or j+r?). Nevada Power Co., et al. v.
Arizona Corp. Comm'n, et al. v. FERC
Arizona Corp. Comm'n, et al. v. FERC Nos. 03-1206, et al. Modification of El Paso's settlement, tariff, and contracts to assign contract demand rights to shippers and restore firm service on the El Paso system.