PUC of California, et al . v. FERC
PUC of California, et al . v. FERC Nos. 01-71051, et al. Bonneville Power Admin., et al . v. FERC Nos. 02-70262, et al.
PacifiCorp, et al . v. FERC
PacifiCorp, et al . v. FERC Nos. 03-72522, et al. Denial of complaints seeking modification of bilateral contracts in Western wholesale power forward markets; determination of applicable standard of review. PacifiCorp v. Reliant Energy Services, et al.
Michigan Public Power Agency v. FERC
Michigan Public Power Agency v. FERC No. 04-1111 Amendment of operating agreements to allow for pass-through of RTO-assessed charges. Michigan Electric Transmission Co ., 104 FERC ¶ 61,236 (2003), reh'g denied , 106 FERC ¶ 61,064 (200 Circuit D.C. Cir.
Elec. Consumers Resource Council v. FERC
Elec. Consumers Resource Council v. FERC No. 03-1449 Approval, as modified, of tariff revisions incorporating Installed Capacity (ICAP) Demand Curve, to encourage investment in new generation and entry into bilateral agreements, and to reduce incentive to withhold capacity.
Rhinelander Paper Co. v. FERC
Rhinelander Paper Co. v. FERC No. 04-1133 Issuance of new license for Rhinelander Project in Wisconsin ; denial of proposal to eliminate non-reservoir lands from project; requirement to monitor and control invasive plant species.
Southern Company Services, Inc. v. FERC
Southern Company Services, Inc. v. FERC Nos. 03-1252, et al. Modification of rollover transmission service agreements between Southern and customers (Williams and Oglethorpe) to remove provision limiting future rollover rights.
Umpqua Valley Audubon Society v. FERC
Umpqua Valley Audubon Society v. FERC No. 04-72600 New license for North Umpqua Project in Douglas County, Oregon; challenge to § 4(e) conditions issued by the Forest Service and adopted as mandatory license conditions.
Columbia Gas Transm. Corp. v. FERC
Columbia Gas Transm. Corp. v. FERC Interpretation of Columbia's tariff to require Columbia to install and pay for meters and meter stations to measure gas received into its system. Nicole Gas Production Ltd., 103 FERC ¶ 61,328 (2003), order on reh'g, 105 FERC 61,371 (2003). No.
Mike Brady and Cheryl Creekmore v. FERC
Mike Brady and Cheryl Creekmore v. FERC No. 04-1058 Authorization to expand and reconfigure marina on project reservoir to increase amount of boating. Grand River Dam Authority, 105 FERC ¶ 61,100 (2003), reh'g denied, 105 FERC ¶ 61,310 (2003). Circuit D.C. Cir.
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. FERC
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. FERC No. 03-1452 Acceptance, as modified, of Tennessee's tariff sheets revising creditworthiness requirements for shippers. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., 102 FERC ¶ 61,075 (2003), order on reh'g, 103 FERC ¶ 61,275 (2003), order on reh'g, 105 FERC ¶ 61,120 (2003).