Appellate Briefs

Union Power Partners v. FERC No. 08-1252 Affirmance of ALJ that Union does not have a contractual right under its interconnection agreement with Entergy to compensation for reactive power. Union Power Partners, L.P., 120 FERC ¶ 61,284 (2007), reh'g denied, 123 FERC ¶ 61,191 (2008). Circuit D.C. Cir.

American Gas Ass'n v. FERC No. 08-1266 Revisions to financial forms, statements and reports for natural gas companies, contained in FERC Form Nos. 2, 2-A, and 3-Q, to enhance their usefulness by updating market and cost information. Revisions to Forms, Statements and Reporting Requirements for Natural Gas Pipelines, Order No. 710, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,267 (2008), order on reh'g & clar., 123 FERC ¶ 61,278 (2008). Circuit D.C. Cir.

Conn. Dept. of Pub. Util. Control v. FERC No. 08-1199 Return on equity rate component sought by Transmission Owners in conjunction with establishment of ISO New England as a Regional Transmission Organization; 100 ROE basis point adder for new transmission constructed by Dec. 31, 2008. Bangor Hydro-Electric Co., et al., Op. No. 489, 117 FERC ¶ 61,129 (2006), reh'g denied, 122 FERC ¶ 61,265 (2008). Circuit D.C. Cir.

American Electric Power Serv. Corp. v. FERC No. 07-1275, et al. Rates for reactive power service by Calpine Oneta, which owns a generating facility in Tulsa, Oklahoma, interconnected with AEP, to Southwest Power Pool. Calpine Oneta Power, L.P., 116 FERC ¶ 61,282 (2006), order on reh'g and compl., 119 FERC ¶ 61,177 (2007), order on reh'g, 121 FERC ¶ 61,189 (2007), reh'g denied, 124 FERC ¶ 61,193 (2008). Circuit D.C. Cir.

SFPP v. FERC and United States No. 08-1110 Order affirming ALJ's initial decision on 2 issues reserved by settlement, concerning validity of unfiled contracts under the Interstate Commerce Act and reparations to shippers. SFPP, L.P., 122 FERC ¶ 61,126 (2008). Circuit D.C. Cir.

Piedmont Environmental Council, et al. v. FERC Nos. 07-1651,et al. Petition for rehearing en banc; Regulations implementing sec. 1221 of Energy Policy Act, adding new FPA sec. 216, providing for federal siting authority over electric transmission facilities in national corridors when state has "withheld approval for more than 1 year". Regulations for Filing Applications for Permits to Site Interstate Electric Transmission Facilities, Order No. 689, 117 FERC ¶ 61,202 (2006), 71 Fed. Reg. 69,440, reh'g denied, 119 FERC ¶ 61,154 (2007). Circuit 4th Cir.

TNA Merchant Projects Inc. v. FERC No. 08-1201 Proposed rate for reactive power and voltage control service; treatment of filing as a rate change subject to suspension and refund. Chehalis Power Generating L.P., 112 FERC ¶ 61,144 (2005), reh'g denied, 113 FERC ¶ 61,259 (2005). Circuit D.C. Cir.

Louisiana Public Service Comm'n v. FERC No. 07-1228 Compliance and timing issues concerning Opinion No. 480 orders and amendment to Entergy System Agreement to maintain rough equalization of production costs among the Entergy System operating companies. Louisiana Public Service Comm'n v. Entergy Services, Inc., 117 FERC ¶ 61,203 (2006), order on reh'g and compl., 119 FERC ¶ 61,095 (2007). Circuit D.C. Cir.

Illinois Commerce Comm'n, et al. v. FERC Nos. 08-1306,et al. Order, after hearing and ALJ Initial Decision, on transmission rate design in PJM for recovery of costs of existing, new, and high-voltage facilities; Order addressing baseline transmission expansion projects submitted pursuant to PJM Regional Transmission Expansion Plan. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., Op. No. 494, 119 FERC ¶ 61,063 (2007), order on reh'g & compl., Op. No. 494-A, 122 FERC ¶ 61,082 (2008); 119 FERC ¶ 61,067 (2007), order on reh'g & compl., 122 FERC ¶ 61,217 (2008). Circuit 7th Cir.

TC Ravenswood, LLC v. FERC Nos. 07-1278, et al. Denial of complaint seeking compensation from the New York ISO for incremental costs incurred by KeySpan during summer 2006 when burning fuel oil, rather than less expensive natural gas, under a local reliability rule; acceptance of NYISO filing to provide recovery to dual-fuel generators of the variable (but not fixed) costs of burning alternative fuels pursuant to local reliability rule (Minimum Oil Burn Rule). KeySpan Ravenswood LLC v. New York ISO, 119 FERC ¶ 61,089 (2007), reh'g denied, 119 FERC ¶ 61,319 (2007); New York ISO, Inc., 119 FERC ¶ 61,130 (2007), reh'g denied, 121 FERC ¶ 61,039 (2007). Circuit D.C. Cir.

Latha Anderson, et al. & Marathon LNG v. FERC Nos. 08-1131, et al. Landowner objections to certificate authorization to construct and operate a new interstate natural gas pipeline in Georgia and South Carolina to transport new volumes of vaporized liquefied natural gas from Elba Island LNG terminal; Marathon objections to rates, terms and conditions of Elba Island LNG terminal expansion service. Southern LNG, Inc., et al., 120 FERC ¶ 61,258 (2007), reh'g denied, 122 FERC ¶ 61,137 (2008). Circuit D.C. Cir.

Joseph M. Keating v. FERC No. 08-1005 Lifting of 1996 stay of construction deadlines and giving notice of termination of license, for failure to obtain necessary approvals and to commence construction, for proposed Tungstar Project. Joseph M. Keating, 120 FERC ¶ 61,246 (2007), reh'g dismissed, 121 FERC ¶ 61,192 (2007). Circuit D.C. Cir.

Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. FERC No. 08-1243 Removal of certain costs associated with gas lost at CIG's Fort Morgan storage field from its lost and unaccounted-for and other fuel gas reimbursement percentage. Colorado Interstate Gas Co., 121 FERC ¶ 61,161 (2007), order on reh'g, 123 FERC ¶ 61,183 (2008). Circuit D.C. Cir.

Alcoa Inc. v. FERC No. 06-1426 Whether the Commission properly held that Alcoa was estopped from challenging the funding method previously approved for the North American Electric Reliability Corp. as the certified Electric Reliability Organization, and if not, whether funding method based on net energy use is just and reasonable. North American Electric Reliability Corp., 116 FERC ¶ 61,062 (2006), order on reh'g & compl., 117 FERC ¶ 61,126 (2006). Circuit D.C. Cir.

Energy Transfer Partners, et al. v. FERC Nos. 08-60730, et al. Direction to show cause why ETP entities did not manipulate wholesale natural gas markets, or otherwise did not provide discriminatory services or charge excessive rates, in violation of the NGA, NGPA, and implementing regulations; whether/when ETP entities are entitled to de novo district court review; subsequent decision to set issues for hearing. Energy Transfer Partners, L.P., et al., 120 FERC ¶ 61,086 (2007), order on reh'g, 121 FERC ¶ 61,282 (2007); 123 FERC ¶ 61,168 (2008), reh'g denied, 124 FERC ¶ 61,149 (2008). Circuit 5th Cir.

Iberdrola Renewables Inc. v. FERC No. 08-1195 Order accepting increase in Alliance's negotiated rates to reflect increase in Alliance's costs. Alliance Pipeline L.P., 121 FERC ¶ 61,309 (2007), reh'g denied, 122 FERC ¶ 61,250 (2008). Circuit

Brian Hunter v. FERC No. 08-5380 Appeal from district court dismissal of Hunter motion to enjoin FERC from continuing show cause/investigative proceeding concerning Hunter's trading activities in natural gas markets; whether FERC, in exercising its new anti-market manipulation authority toward "any entity" under section 315 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, has personal jurisdiction to proceed against individuals. Amaranth Advisors LLC, et al., 120 FERC ¶ 61,085 (2007), reh'g denied, 121 FERC ¶ 61,224 (2007). Circuit D.C. Cir.

South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. v. FERC No. 08-72265 Authorization to allow North Baja to construct facilities to increase pipeline capacity and to allow for importation from Mexico of regasified liquefied natural gas; impact on air quality of consumption of regasified LNG. North Baja Pipeline, LLC, 121 FERC ¶ 61,010 (2006), order denying reh'g and stay, 123 FERC ¶ 61,073 (2008). Circuit 9th Cir.

Amaranth Advisors L.L.C., et al. v. FERC No. 07-1491 Initiation of show cause/investigative proceeding concerning Amaranth's trading activities in natural gas markets; whether FERC, in exercising its new anti-market manipulation authority under section 315 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, has encroached upon the exclusive jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Amaranth Advisors LLC, et al., 120 FERC ¶ 61,085 (2007), reh'g denied, 121 FERC ¶ 61,224 (2007). Circuit D.C. Cir.

Connecticut Dept. of Pub. Util. Control v. FERC No. 07-1375 Whether FERC has jurisdiction to review ISO New England's Installed Capacity Requirement, i.e., the amount of capacity which each Load Serving Entity must supply annually under the ISO Tariff. ISO New England, Inc., et al., 118 FERC ¶ 61,157 (2007), reh'g denied, 120 FERC ¶ 61,234 (2007); 119 FERC ¶ 61,161 (2007), reh'g denied, 121 FERC ¶ 61,125 (2007); 122 FERC ¶ 61,144 (2008), reh'g denied, 123 FERC ¶ 61,036 (2008). Circuit D.C. Cir.