Appellate Briefs

Montana Consumer Counsel v. FERC

Montana Consumer Counsel v. FERC (Supplemental Brief) Nos. 07-73256, et al. Finding that PPL Companies had rebutted the presumption of market power in the control area operated by NorthWestern Corp. and had satisfied the standards for the grant of market-based rate authority. PPL Montana, LLC, et al., 115 FERC¶61,204 (2006), reh'g denied, 120 FERC¶61,096 (2007). Circuit 9th Cir.
Appellate Briefs

Delaware Dept. of Natural Resources v. FERC

Delaware Dept. of Natural Resources v. FERC No. 07-1007 Conditional approval, pending necessary state approvals, of Crown Landing's application to construct and operate a liquefied natural gas terminal in Logan Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey. Crown Landing LLC, 115 FERC ¶ 61,348 (2006), reh'g denied, 117 FERC ¶ 61,209 (2006). Circuit D.C. Cir.
Appellate Briefs

Cities of Anaheim, et al. v. FERC

Cities of Anaheim, et al. v. FERC Nos. 07-1222, et al. Must-offer and reliability service obligations in California; timing of rate change. Independent Energy Producers Ass'n v. California ISO, et al., 116 FERC ¶ 61,069 (2006), 116 FERC ¶ 61,297 (2006), and 118 FERC ¶ 61,096 and ¶ 61,097 (2007), order on reh'g and compl., 119 FERC ¶ 61,266 (2007), and 121 FERC ¶ 61,276 (2007). Circuit D.C. Cir.
Appellate Briefs

American Forest & Paper Ass'n v. FERC

American Forest & Paper Ass'n v. FERC No. 07-1328 Rulemaking adding new 18 CFR § 292.309 and implementing new section 210(m) of PURPA, as added by Energy Policy Act of 2005, allowing termination of obligation of electric utilities to purchase electricity from PURPA qualifying facilities, when the QF has nondiscriminatory access to certain categories of markets. New PURPA Section 210(m) Regulations Applicable to Small Power Production and Cogeneration Facilities, Order No. 688, 117 FERC ¶ 61,078 (2006), order on reh'g, 119 FERC ¶ 61,305 (2007). Circuit D.C. Cir.
Appellate Briefs

Braintree Elec. Light Dep't v. FERC

Braintree Elec. Light Dep't v. FERC Nos. 04-1335, et al. Orders accepting filing of proposed tariff revisions for the collection of the ISO's administrative costs, including alleged lobbying costs. ISO New England, Inc., 106 FERC ¶ 61,294 (2004), reh'g denied, 108 FERC ¶ 61,138 (2004); 109 FERC ¶ 61,383 (2004), reh'g denied, 111 FERC ¶ 61,096 (2005); 113 FERC ¶ 61,341 (2005), reh'g denied, 114 FERC ¶ 61,315 (2006). Circuit D.C. Cir.
Appellate Briefs

ExxonMobil Corp. v. FERC

ExxonMobil Corp. v. FERC Nos. 07-1306, et al. Various orders on complaints concerning classification of facilities and availability of transmission credits (Duke-Hinds). ExxonMobil Corp., 118 FERC & 61,032, reh'g denied, 119 FERC ¶ 61,261 (2007); Union Power Partners, 118 FERC ¶ 61,134, reh'g denied, 119 FERC ¶ 61,328 (2007); Tenaska Alabama II Partners, 118 FERC ¶ 61,037, on reh'g, 119 FERC ¶ 61,315 (2007); Mirant Las Vegas, 118 FERC ¶ 61,034, reh'g denied, 120 FERC ¶ 61,002 (2007). Circuit D.C. Cir.
Appellate Briefs

Tesoro Refining and Marketing v. FERC & USA

Tesoro Refining and Marketing v. FERC & USA No. 07-1461 Dismissal of complaint challenging index-based rate increases for Calnev for 2005-2007. Tesoro Refining and Marketing Co. v. Calnev Pipe Line, L.L.C., 121 FERC ¶ 61,142 (2007). Circuit D.C. Cir.
Appellate Briefs

California Trout, et al. v. FERC

California Trout, et al. v. FERC Nos. 07-73664, et al. Denials of late intervention, after issuance of Environmental Assessment on proposed amendment, revising minimum flow and fishery requirements, to license for the California Aqueduct Project. California Dept. of Water Resources and the City of Los Angeles, 120 FERC ¶ 61,057 (2007) (reh'g of notice denying late intervention), reh'g rejected, 120 FERC ¶ 61,248 (2007); 122 FERC ¶ 61,150 (2008) (reh'g of notice denying late intervention). Circuit 9th Cir.
Appellate Briefs

Louisiana Public Serv. Comm'n v. FERC

Louisiana Public Serv. Comm'n v. FERC No. 07-1175 Market-based sales of electric power and capacity between Entergy affiliates under 2002 request for proposals auction; discrete right of first refusal and cost allocation issues. Entergy Services, Inc., et al., Opinion No. 485, 116 FERC ¶ 61,296 (2006), order on reh'g, 119 FERC ¶ 61,019 (2007). Circuit D.C. Cir.
Appellate Briefs

Entergy Services, Inc. v. FERC

Entergy Services, Inc. v. FERC No. 07-1343 Opinion, reversing ALJ initial decision, that certain general billing provisions and principles in the 1977 agreement between Entergy Arkansas and Arkansas Electric Cooperative do not permit Entergy to take transmission system operating constraints into account in determining availability of Arkansas Electric's generating units for purposes of billing. Arkansas Electric Coop. Corp. v. Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Opinion No. 488, 117 FERC ¶ 61,099 (2006), order on reh'g, 119 FERC ¶ 61,314 (2007). Circuit D.C. Cir.
Appellate Briefs

Richard Blumenthal, Att'y Gen. of Conn. v. FERC

Richard Blumenthal, Att'y Gen. of Conn. v. FERC No. 07-1130 Denial of complaint seeking to require all electric generation facilities in Connecticut to be compensated on a cost-of-service basis through RMR agreements. Richard Blumenthal, Attorney General of Conn., et al. v. ISO New England, 117 FERC ¶ 61,038 (2006), reh'g denied, 118 FERC ¶ 61,205 (2007). Circuit D.C. Cir.
Appellate Briefs

FPL Energy Maine Hydro v. FERC

FPL Energy Maine Hydro v. FERC No. 05-1871 Stay, pending state judicial review process, of new license for the Flagstaff Project because of denial of Clean Water Act water quality certification by Maine Board of Environmental Protection. FPL Energy Maine Hydro, LLC, 108 FERC ¶ 61,261 (2004), reh'g denied, 111 FERC ¶ 61,104 (2005). Circuit 1st. Cir.
Appellate Briefs

Missouri Coalition for the Environment v. FERC

Missouri Coalition for the Environment v. FERC No. 08-1390 Authorization to Ameren to reconstruct and repair upper reservoir of Taum Sauk Project. AmerenUE, 121 FERC ¶ 61,270 (2007) (denying reh'g of Aug. 15, 2007 letter order). Circuit 8th Cir.
Appellate Briefs

Port of Seattle, Washington v. FERC

Port of Seattle, Washington v. FERC Nos. 06-72957, et al. Approval of contested settlements of disputes, arising from Western energy crisis, between Reliant, Idaho Power, IDACORP, California Parties, and FERC Staff. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Sellers of Energy and Ancillary Services, et al., 113 FERC ¶ 61,308 (2005), reh'g denied, 115 FERC ¶ 61,271 (2006); 115 FERC ¶ 61,230 (2006); order on reh'g, 117 FERC ¶ 61,020 (2006). Circuit 9th Cir.
Appellate Briefs

Albany Engineering Corp. v. FERC

Albany Engineering Corp. v. FERC No. 07-1162 Complaint concerning assessment under New York law of headwater benefits that Fourth Branch's Mechanicville Project receives from operation of District's upstream Great Sacandaga Lake Project. Fourth Branch Assocs. (Mechanicville) v. Hudson River - Black River Regulating District, 117 FERC ¶ 61,321 (2006), order on reh'g, 119 FERC ¶ 61,141 (2007). Circuit D.C. Cir.
Appellate Briefs

Green Island Power Authority, et al. v. FERC

Green Island Power Authority, et al. v. FERC Nos. 07-1737, et al. Relicensing of School Street Project on the Mohawk River in New York; efforts to develop and construct competing Cohoes Falls Project. Erie Boulevard Hydropower, L.P., 117 FERC ¶ 61,189 (2006), reh'g rejected, 118 FERC ¶ 61,196 (2007); 118 FERC ¶ 61,101 (2007), reh'g denied, 120 FERC ¶ 61,267 (2007), and various notices rejecting pleadings. Circuit 2nd Cir.
Appellate Briefs

Public Serv. Comm'n of Wisconsin v. FERC

Public Serv. Comm'n of Wisconsin v. FERC Nos. 06-1408, et al. Order on proposed transmission expansion planning protocols, accepting ISO's proposed methodology for cost allocation for Baseline Reliability Projects above 345 kV. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc., 114 FERC ¶ 61,106 (2006), order on reh'g, 117 FERC ¶ 61,241 (2006). Circuit D.C. Cir.
Appellate Briefs

North Star Steel Co., LLC v. FERC

North Star Steel Co., LLC v. FERC No. 07-73550 Denial of complaint, finding that FERC lacks jurisdiction over request for refunds to a retail customer of Arizona Electric Power Cooperative during 2000-2001 energy crisis. North Star Steel Co. v. Arizona Public Service Co., et al., 116 FERC ¶ 61,022 (2006), reh'g denied, 120 FERC ¶ 61,146 (2007). Circuit 9th Cir.
Appellate Briefs

Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. FERC

Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. FERC Nos. 05-1372, et al. Order granting complaint, concerning charges for delivery of station power by ConEd to Entergy generating facilities; order granting complaint that ConEd interfered with NYPA's efforts to employ station power procurement and delivery provisions of New York ISO Services Tariff. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., et al. v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc., 110 FERC ¶ 61,312 (2005), reh'g denied, 112 FERC ¶ 61,117 (2005); New York Power Authority v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc., 112 FERC ¶ 61,304 (2005), reh'g denied, 116 FERC ¶ 61,240 (2006). Circuit D.C. Cir.
Appellate Briefs

Washington Gas Light Co. v. FERC

Washington Gas Light Co. v. FERC No. 07-1015 Authorization of expansion of Cove Point LNG's existing LNG import terminal and construction of Dominion's new downstream pipeline and storage facilities. Dominion Cove Point LNG, LP, 115 FERC ¶ 61,337 (2006), order on reh'g, 118 FERC ¶ & 61,007 (2007); 115 FERC ¶ 61,336 (2006), order on reh'g, 118 FERC ¶ 61,006 (2007). Circuit D.C. Cir.