Frontier Pipeline Co., et al. v. FERC
Frontier Pipeline Co., et al. v. FERC Nos. 04-1343, et al. J. Albert Entitlement to, and calculation of, reparations arising from payments under joint rates and third party shipments. Big West Oil Co.,et al., 106 FERC ¶ 61,171 (2004), order on reh'g, 108 FERC ¶ 61,183 (2004). Circuit D.C.
IDACORP Energy, L.P., et al. v. FERC
IDACORP Energy, L.P., et al. v. FERC Nos. 04-1145, et al. Finding that, under ISO Tariff, neutrality adjustment charge applies on an hourly basis. Cities of Anaheim, et al. v.
Boston Edison Co. v. FERC
Boston Edison Co. v. FERC Nos. 04-2590, et al. Order, affirming initial decision, that Boston Edison charges for local network service to Towns of Wellesley and Concord, Mass.
National Comm. for the New River v. FERC
National Comm. for the New River v. FERC Nos. 03-1251, et al. Challenge to post-certificate delegated orders allowing construction of specific portions of Patriot Project extension and operation of one segment, all as consistent with the conditions set out in certificate order.
Southern California Water Co. v. FERC
Southern California Water Co. v. FERC No. 04-1324 Refunds for charging market-based power sales rate without prior Commission authorization. Southern California Water Co., 106 FERC ¶ 61,305 (2004), reh'g denied , 108 FERC ¶ 61,168 (2004). Circuit D.C. Cir.
Old Dominion Electric Coop., Inc. v. FERC
Old Dominion Electric Coop., Inc. v. FERC No. 04-1307 Approval of contested settlement resolving remaining issues (allocation of filing rights; withdrawal from ISO) on remand. PJM, et al., 105 FERC ¶ 61,294 (2003), reh'g denied , 108 FERC ¶ 61,032 (2004). Circuit D.C. Cir.
CA Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. FERC
CA Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. FERC Nos. 04-73498, et al. Amendment of license for Potter Valley Project in N. California, to reflect modifications for the benefit of federally-protected salmonids; consideration of alternatives.
Save Our Sebasticook v. FERC
Save Our Sebasticook v. FERC No. 04-1221 Surrender of project license and removal of project dam, over objections of citizens preferring installation of a fish pump to allow fish passage and preservation of project reservoir.
FPL Energy Marcus Hook, L.P. v. FERC
FPL Energy Marcus Hook, L.P. v. FERC No. 04-1341 Denial of complaint on allocation of interconnection costs and risks among PJM transmission customers. FPL Energy Marcus Hook, L.P. v. PJM Interconnection, 107 FERC ¶ 61,069 (2004), order on reh'g, 108 FERC ¶ 61,171 (2004). Circuit D.C. Cir.
Southern California Edison Co. v. FERC
Southern California Edison Co. v. FERC No. 04-1396 R. Solomon Recertification of geothermal facility as a PURPA qualifying facility; determination of net capacity for sale. Ormesa LLC, 107 FERC ¶ 61,043 (2004), reh'g denied, 108 FERC ¶ 61,299 (2004). Circuit D.C. Cir.